Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Moonstruck (1987)

Nominee

I am not entirely sure what happened to me...so I am just going to start by listing some of the components of this film and I believe they will speak for my bemusement:

1.) Cher is in this movie
2.) Nicolas Cage is in this movie
3.) Cher and Nicolas Cage are in a movie together
4.) Nicolas Cage plays a man who lost a hand to a bread slicer who also fancies the opera
5.) They are all playing Brooklyn Italians (aka my family)
6.) Cher and Nicolas Cage fall in love in the movie

You know I think I liked it....but only really because it exists. I would like to thank the world for giving me a movie with all the above pieces. Should this have ever been nominated for best picture? For all the above reasons: no. The acting is appalling (minus Olympia Dukakis; she is actually quite a good character actress), the shooting is mediocre and it is funny for all the wrong reasons. Also it's a romantic comedy...I almost always hate romantic comedies.

Overall: I think everyone should see this film. It has Cher AND Nicolas Cage, but if you want to watch the truly funny version instead go watch My Big Fat Greek Wedding. Happy Watching!

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Les Miserables (2012)

Nominee

When turning any musical into a film, one must push the gambit. When turning Les Miserables into a feature film one must create a new standard to which all other musical adaptions will be compared, and I do believe this film succeeds. Gracefully using the medium to find new meanings in the story, and raising the emotional capacity of all of the characters, this film retells a story we all know and love and yet it is renewed. It is as if we are listening for the first time and it is vibrant in nature.

Tom Hooper has an incredible visual aesthetic where he utilizes a dark color palate but is able to find the richness and depth of each shade. So in the saturation alone this film is beautiful, but then add the framing and it is impossible to look away.  He allows us incredible access to the characters with his close ups, giving us one thing the stage could not, intimacy between the actor and the viewer not only with the leads but with the extras as well.  This, however, puts a lot of responsibility on the actors, luckily this ensemble cast delivers. 

Hugh Jackman as Jean Valjean, is haunted by his past but driven forward by a need for absolution. His singing is great and I found him to be emotionally enrapturing. Anne Hathaway, although criticized by some for the shakiness of her voice, I think found the much needed truth of "I Dreamed a Dream", its a song by a woman who hit rock bottom and is longing for her former days of promise. So why is it that everyone insists on belting it?? In addition, she was heart wrenching in and throughout her performance as a mother who gives all for a daughter she will never know. Russell Crowe as the stark moralist Inspector Javert may not be the best singer they could have found for the role but he was solid, and his acting was representative of his inner conflict. Aaron Tveit and Eddie Redmayne were revelations as Enjolras and Marius. Their singing was absolutely  phenomenal, also can I just say quickly: freckles. Amanda Seyfried was very nice as Cossette, I did not find the love plot as intolerable as I usually do. Cohen and Carter provide the much needed comic relief...Cohen kinda out plays Carter but both are respectable. The children actors show incredible maturity, and thank you whoever thought bringing Colm Wilkinson in was a good idea, I affirm you. I saved her for last because honestly I found her the most disappointing, Samantha Banks as Eponine. She sang the part well but I felt she played up the doe eyed lover too much and forgot the gritty streetwise Eponine in the mix. She fell a little flat to me. 

What can I say about this music that has not already been said? And here it stands by its own reputation. 

My few complaints? I will make them brief...Some of the word replacing was strange. I found myself laughing a few times at inappropriate places due to some of the changes. Also they piled the two most epic songs of the movie on top of each other. They should have left "Do You Hear the People Sing" and "One Day More" apart, share the love. Also some of the symbolism came a little too early on...I mean come on you have almost three hours of film, don't have Valjean literally lifting a gigantic French flag from the dirt in the first five minutes.  BUT...

Overall: The musical theater community has waited 25 years to see this film, and it was well worth the wait. Telling this story of hope, freedom, and loss is one of great weight but when it is executed correctly there is nothing more staying. The vision is there, the actors play their parts, and the music will reach you through the screen. Now go hear the people sing, Happy Watching!!

Friday, January 4, 2013

The Caine Mutiny (1954)

Nominee

This film left me with the occasional memorable moment but overall, I must admit, very lukewarm. As in most classic films of the 1950's The Caine Mutiny is very heavily plot driven and unfortunately I only liked about 40% of it. 

The movie is comprised of two story lines one being a muddled love story of a young Ensign, Willie Seward Keith. This literally does nothing for the movie as a whole, and the mother vs. girlfriend plot is overly simplistic and repetitive throughout. Not to mention most of the dialogue in these scenes is just bland and nonsensical. The better part is the actual mutiny on board the minesweeper. As the crew grows weary of the crazed whims of Captain Queeg a moral obligation to duty is placed against the protection of their own lives. However once we leave the ship and progress into the court room scenes, I found much of the content maddening. None of the witnesses ever explicate on the circumstances that led to their mutiny. And although I recognize the film means to highlight the problematic nature of loyalty versus necessity of survival, that should not mean it gets to disregard the obvious. However, the actual scenes on board the Caine, most notably the strawberry sequence, are particularly memorable, and actually quite enjoyable.

Also the actors involved do a solid job in their representation of the characters. With Humphrey Bogart leading as the imbalanced Captain Queeg, he gives his usual strong performance  While Jose Ferrer, Van Johnson, and Fred MacMurray highlight the complicated nature of their predicament with keen understanding. 

Overall: Its not a bad watch, but its just not a great one either. I would say you could cut half the movie and just watch the parts with good ol' Bogey. Also be wary of snacking on strawberries. Until next time, Happy Watching!   

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Lincoln (2012)

Nominee 

I have some serious catching up to do...So lets begin by discussing pure genius. There is nothing I love more than the perfect marriage of artistry and narrative understanding in a film. Now when asked to offer an example of this I will say: Lincoln. Spielberg's honesty in his storytelling while also presenting visual intricacy is why time and time again he has been at the forefront of our admiration. He searches for the truth of every frame and every time it is achieved.

In bringing to life an American icon such as Lincoln you run the risk of either creating a perfected character who lacks dimension, or tearing away to much and complicating our perceptions. This films walks the line and creates a Lincoln true to the progressive morality that we love him for but perhaps more ruthless than originally conceived. As Lincoln presses for the passing of the 13th Amendment (The abolition of slavery), he negotiates both the system and his obligation for the betterment of America, and for it we love him all the more.

This cast is astounding in their portrayals. Daniel Day Lewis is unparalleled in his presentation of the complexity of Lincoln. He plays a man both broken and resolute, truly a character before his time. I did find his physicality at time a bit to aware of its imitation, reminding me I was watching an actor portraying a character instead of the man himself. However his overall understanding of the character flirts with perfection, and is certainly Oscar worthy. In addition, the ensemble cast builds the tensions in Lincoln's life. Sally Field as Mary Todd shows a woman tied by the binds of her times and as a result is forceful in her protection of her family. While Tommy Lee Jones basically steals the show with his intelligent and hard hitting Thaddeus Stevens, giving life to an unsung hero of history. (Also one of the founders of Gettysburg College....so I may be biased...)

The screenplay by Tony Kushner is incredible. It is inspiring without being oppressive in rhetoric or too overstated. His words make the characters real.  Also, John Williams' score offers emotional depth to the entirety of the film... as to be expected.

In recognition of how I am being very long winded...I have but one more category to highlight. Lighting!! Echoing the emotional discourse  throughout the film, Lincoln walks through light and shadow allowing meaning to be accessed in yet another layer of the visual. It is very beautifully done.

Overall: This film is nothing short of a triumph. Its historical relevance goes beyond movie making and provides a remarkable viewing experience. It was a classic the moment it hit the screen; a must see. Happy Watching!

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Mean Girls (2004)

A Birthday Dedication to:
My friend, Katie

Katie is also abroad right now and it's actually her birthday today so I thought it was best to do her all time favorite film! Which also happens to be a cultural classic and for good reason!

Here is a film that pushes limits with its humor while also finding moments that are actually very meaningful. We have all been there. We all,at some point, will or have already navigated the halls of high school, and as this film so rightly points out...it's a jungle. Yet as Cady walks through this film finding herself we find some of the most quoted lines of our decade...

"Boo you whore." "You can't just ask people why they're white!" "He is almost too gay to function.""SHE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE!""The limit does not exist!"...and as you all know... the list goes on. You can barely go five minutes into a conversation without someone quoting this movie and it is because of the gritty humanism it achieves. Tina Fey pulls out all the things we are thinking and willingly places it on screen for our enjoyment. And she is so very right: we love it!

Not to mention it hearkens you back to some of the other teen dramas. Things like The Breakfast Club or 10 Things I Hate About You, that gave voices to the teens of the 80's and 90's. Mean Girls is the voice of our teen years and for that it will always be special to us. 

In addition, its fun to see Rachel McAdams at the beginning of her career. And, it really makes you hope that Lindsay Lohan will get her life together. But perhaps most importantly it does teach a lesson of acceptance and understanding that transcends its high school setting.

Overall: I don't need to tell you this...but this film is hysterical and heartwarming. While also showing a keen understanding of the struggles of being a teen or rather a person in general.  Happy Birthday Katie! Happy Watching! You Go Glen Coco!

Black Beauty (1994)

A Birthday Dedication to: 
My Friend, Kevin

One of my best college friends is abroad right now...so for his birthday I thought I would review his  favorite childhood movie. 

I remember finding this film extremely boring as a child, so when I heard him say it was his favorite film I was a little baffled. But as I sat on my three hour train ride back home for Thanksgiving I figured what is the harm? If I fall asleep that's alright...If I am pleasantly surprised that is even better. And you know...I think I was surprised.

Yes the dialogue is amateurish and some of the content is pretty bleak for a kids film but this film is actually visually very appealing. There is something quite pleasant about being immersed in pastoral England watching beautiful horses run free. Especially because the color is so much more vibrant compared to today's films. We seem to have fallen into a dark aesthetic nowadays and it was refreshing to watch something that was genuinely warm at times. 

In addition, it was shot very well. The personification of the horses is achieved mostly through framing. Often finding their very giving eyes at the center of a shot, it really made you feel connected to this protagonist regardless of the species gap. 

Also the music by Danny Elfman is beautiful and sweeping truly giving life to this horse beyond the dialogue. 

A couple other things I was entertained by: 1.) Black Beauty has a Scottish accent...alright I am down 2.) Yes if you squint you can see a very young Sean Bean and David Thewlis ...so Boromir and Lupin made it into a film together.

Overall: This is a children's movie that I think I got more out of as an adult. No it is by no means a great film, but you know for an hour and twenty minutes it is actually quite touching. Happy Birthday, Kevin! And Happy Watching! ;)


Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Midnight in Paris (2011)

Nominee

There is nothing better than Woody Allen taking the very intellectualism he himself clearly loves and shamelessly presenting it with satirical whimsy. Now place that within the artistic and literary rich history of Paris, and you have created genius.

The film starts with Gil Pender (Owen Wilson) and his fiancee, Inez (Rachel McAdams) traveling in Paris with her parents. Pender is a Hollywood screenwriter with a longing to pen something more substantial, while Inez looks for fulfillment through either material wealth, or feigning interest in art but only from the tourist necessity.When this ill suited couple run into Inez's old professor, the rift begins to grow and while Inez goes out dancing, Pender goes for a walk. Yet as the bell tolls midnight, Wilson is picked up by an 1920's Peugeot and taken back to the modernist period, meeting the likes of Getrude Stein, Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Dali, and Picasso...to name a few. These midnight encounters continue over a number of nights, and as the film progresses Pender discovers that although the allure of the past is inviting, it is best to create progress in the present.

Pender is every bit the classic deadpan Allen protagonist, a bit down on his luck and starved for meaning, yet he is completely understated in presentation and in reaction to his circumstance. Owen Wilson delivers this character effortlessly, making it that much more enjoyable to witness the fantastical story.

Speaking of which...the premise of this movie could not be more inviting. There is nothing more fun than bearing witness to the resurrection of the great thinkers of our time. And Woody Allen's screenplay brought them to us in a way that had to win the Oscar. 

I do have two complaints: 1.) The marketing was incredibly wrong. (SURPRISE) They made it look like an Owen Wilson/Rachel McAdams chick flick...I am sure that crowd was disappointed and 2.) The opening cityscape shots drag, but I am impatient.

Overall: This is Woody Allen at his best. Give me subdued understated dialogue within ridiculous circumstance or give me death! Not to mention I love a good cultural or historical reference and this film was brimming with them. Definitely a good time. Happy Watching!